User talk:Heolkpop

This is Heolkpop's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hello, Heolkpop, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to 2018 Singapore Premier League. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 01:30, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for the warm welcome! These links will surely help me in my journey in the Wikipedia world. Thank you again! Heolkpop (talk) 02:14, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi...thank Heolkpop for edit back my editing at 2018 in south korean music article... i did not know that soompi is not relevant source..before...btw thanks for remind me..fromRoad boyz24 (talk) 07:07, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Road boyz24: Hello! Not a problem. Wikipedia is a place where we can learn and grow. There is nothing wrong with making mistakes as long as we learn from them. :) Heolkpop (talk) 07:43, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Woollim Entertainment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Golden Child (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@DPL bot: Whoops, thanks for telling me! Heolkpop (talk) 10:01, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dream Your Dream has been accepted

Dream Your Dream, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

EROS ^message 10:11, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep up the good work

Just wanted to drop by to thank you for changing related articles of SM Entertainment reflecting the name change of SM. Keep up the good work! Cheers. –Wefk423 (talk) 15:30, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Wefk423: Hello! Thank you for the compliment, and it is not a problem. :) Cheers! Heolkpop (talk) 10:19, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited UNI.T, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KBS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About table

what is mean by colspan and rowspan???? can you explain Road boyz24 (talk) 11:54, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Road boyz24: Rowspan is to merge the cells down (vertical) while colspan is to merge the cells across (horizontal). Hope this helps! Heolkpop (talk) 14:02, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Heolkpop: really help..thanks yah Road boyz24 (talk) 14:48, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Road boyz24: Not a problem! :) Heolkpop (talk) 15:33, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Heolkpop: hey how to make the description be at the top of infobox artist..like the kpop artist article..where the description of the group at the top of infobox..i tried many time but can't...help me Road boyz24 (talk) 22:29, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Road boyz24: What do you mean? On mobile or on desktop? Heolkpop (talk) 02:39, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Heolkpop: at mobile...Road boyz24 (talk) 03:03, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Road boyz24: Just place the text below the infobox. The text will automatically be on top of the infobox once saved. Heolkpop (talk) 05:57, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Heolkpop: ok...thank for helping..Road boyz24 (talk) 07:51, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Road boyz24: Not a problem! :) Heolkpop (talk) 08:47, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About Chinese girl group Rocket Girls.

Hi, I think Rocket Girls' Chinese name is "火箭少女101", with the "101" part, as they announced on the final episode of Produce 101 China; and the Chinese Wikipedia page of Rocket Girls is also named (火箭少女101). KenniS (talk) 07:36, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi KenniS. I removed "101" as according to the article's name which is Rocket Girls, not Rocket Girls 101. But don't worry about it, "火箭少女101" has already added onto "Also known as" parameter in the infobox. Heolkpop (talk) 03:27, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Iz one

The term “South Korean-Japanese” is one of the key points in the background how this group was made. In a sense, expression with both countries as their origination is not appropriate. Although many articles and presses use it as the representative wording, that is just simply convenient way to give people the idea of the group. However, “IZ*ONE” is strictly the girl group made by South Korean variety show “Produce 48” and there was no entities such as any Japanese staffs, directing etc. How would you call this as “Co-production”? That is more correct to call it like “Collaboration”. Furthermore, think about the impression to people who don’t know about the background. When they read it and understand like “Co-production”, they would think it’s a girl group made by both South Korea and Japan like the half and half. However, it’s totally wrong. This is a sensitive issue for Korean fans because it would be delivered in the wrong way like this group is organized by mainly Japanese with some Koreans. It will possibly happen. Koreans made whole things and why should not their efforts be deserved as they did? Mkenny6 (talk) 04:03, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Mkenny6: Like what we have previously discussed on your talk page and Talk:Iz One, if you have sources from reliable news outlets to back up your statements, feel free to share them, but until you do, I can't really back you up on this. Please read WP:NEUTRAL, WP:ORIGINAL, and WP:RELIABLE. It's Wikipedia's policy to deliver a neutral point of view, and you continuing to edit against consensus will lead to competence issues on your part. I have already warned you about edit warring. lullabying (talk) 04:45, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recommend edit summaries

Hi Heolkpop, I would recommend leaving a reason for removing someone's edits such as with this revert. It lets the editor know what they did wrong. You can easily "template" a user with one of these more common templates: WP:TUSER. Be careful that you don't escalate the level inappropriately. Use a vandalism template only if the others don't fit. I.e. that one on Iz one should probably use {{uw-unsourced1|Iz one}}. Templating helps get problematic editors reported properly to wp:AIV and would help avoid your being blocked for wp:EW. I would suggest reviewing wp:vandalism to understand the Wikipedia meaning of the word. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 23:57, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jim1138: Hi Jim, I understand. I do "template" users for vandalism but only when the edit is malicious. I will be sure to follow your advice as mine is definitely not a good practice. Thank you for the heads-up. Heolkpop (talk) 02:47, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Heolkpop. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The group is called IZ*ONE and not Iz One

i've tried to change it to IZ*ONE but the bot has reverted the edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glass kei (talk • contribs) 21:34, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Big Bang (South Korean band) GA Reassessment

Big Bang (South Korean band), an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. DanielleTH ^{(Say hi!)} 16:59, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:32, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: In what way are they unreliably sourced? There is a consensus among WP:KO users that using Naver links are still appropriate. The fact that you are still calling unreliable despite the community consensus is definitely what Wikipedia is against. Even on WP:KO/RS, it is clearly stated that Naver links, excluding those link to the blog side, can be used for reference. And I say again, if you are against with this consensus, please raise your concern there. Heolkpop (talk) 02:53, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I explained that a few times already. Your edit summaries, unfortunately, don’t make a lot of sense. That RS page just looks like a list made up by a few people: there is no discussion on Naver on the talk page, let alone consensus. K-pop is already plagued by an overdose of marketing: not being able to tell the difference between a portal run by an entertainment company and a journalistic publication is not unexpected. Drmies (talk) 03:15, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: Apologies if my edit summaries do not make sense as I felt it is better to engage on talk page where I could elaborate further. The proper example of Naver is MSN. For example, in this news article, it is written by Mark Kennedy of Associated Press but it is published on MSN. You may probably find the same article on the AP site itself and the content will still be the same. What I am trying to say is that Naver works exactly like this. Naver also has a section called "News" which helps to conveniencely collate and find related news articles per the search bar. So not just K-pop, you can also search for news articles relating to the current political and economical state of South Korea or other countries (if you can read Hangul), as example here. Also, you got it all wrong – Naver is not an entertainment company but a search engine. I am puzzled how did you come to this conclusion. Heolkpop (talk) 03:50, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And that article should be cited from the AP, not from "MSN". Naver is indeed a company that does all kinds of things, and entertainment is one of them; look it up at Naver (corporation), so that's how I came to that conclusion. "Portal" and "search engine" are very much related terms. You still insist that it's somehow OK to cite a search engine; what's odd is that you are here, edit warring over a basic issue (in a GA, no less), wasting everyone's time, while you could just have proven your point by citing the original source. It's really not that difficult. Drmies (talk) 14:03, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: Accusing me of edit warring when I offer you a discussion on Exo's talk page? There is a huge difference between Naver the corporation (conglomerate) and Naver the search engine; the latter is subsidiary of the former. Adding Naver-link sources would undermine its GA status? Then explain to me why are there still references linking to Naver in that Exo article? How did it get GA in the first place? Heolkpop (talk) 13:02, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

River Where the Moon Rises

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=River_Where_the_Moon_Rises&oldid=prev&diff=1003948625

I have a reason. River Where the Moon Rises is a Viu original Korean drama, but it doesn't list program which first appeared on a different network per Seokgjin. -St3095 ^(?) 16:25, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Football Association of Singapore crest.svg

Hi Heolkpop. Please note that the non-free File:Football Association of Singapore crest.svg was removed from some articles by an administrator named Explicit per Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 March 18#File:Football Association of Singapore crest.svg. If you feel an error was made or would otherwise like further clarification, please follow WP:CLOSECHALLENGE and discuss your concerns with Explicit, and he will advise you accordingly. Thank you. — Marchjuly (talk) 09:51, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly: Thanks for the heads-up. Will proceed to that discussion for more clarifications. Heolkpop (talk) 11:12, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]